Example: Organizing an ambiguous employer draft
Prepared and reviewed: 2026-10-12
An illustrative workflow and fictional sample designed by Atlas Support. Referenced organizations are not presented as our clients, partners, or implementations.

Blank worksheet
Job ID, employer, and draft version: ____________________
Duties and references: ____________________
Required conditions: ____________________
Preferred conditions: ____________________
Pay and work terms with sources: ____________________
Source conflicts: ____________________
Employer questions: ____________________
Confirmed answers, approver, and registration date: ____________________

Fictional example
Field: Duties
Draft or extracted value: Business-to-business service sales, existing accounts and new proposals
Evidence or question: Duties in draft v1

Field: Requirements
Draft or extracted value: Business sales experience: required or preferred remains unconfirmed
Evidence or question: Draft says preferred; notes say required

Field: Pay
Draft or extracted value: JPY4–6 million annually; breakdown pending
Evidence or question: Confirm allowances and included overtime terms with the employer

Field: Work arrangements
Draft or extracted value: Possible locations are listed; remote-working conditions are pending
Evidence or question: Do not add unstated arrangements

Human review
- Compare pay, hours, location, and employment terms with the employer-confirmed draft. Keep required and preferred conditions distinct and avoid adding new conditions.
- Before updating the ATS, check the job ID, fields to change, and approved information. Retain a change history and have the responsible person confirm the published description.

Guide: https://atlassupportai.com/use-cases/recruitment-job-description-ai